Evaluation Form for RESEARCH-TYPE Papers
Question No Evaluation Questions Very Poor Poor Mediocre Good Very Good
1 Is the heading of the paper appropriate in terms of defining the study? (Must be short and concise, must reflect the content of the study and must be appropriate in terms of describing and generalizing the study) 1 2 3 4 5
2 The originality of the study in terms of its subject 1 2 3 4 5
3 The importance of and grounds for the study 1 2 3 4 5
4 The study's compliance with the main theme of the Congress 1 2 3 4 5
5 Clear indication of the aim of the study 1 2 3 4 5
6 Place, time and type of the study 1 2 3 4 5
7 The universe, sample size and sampling method of the study 1 2 3 4 5
8 Measures for inclusion into or exclusion from the study 1 2 3 4 5
9 The data collection method adopted in the study 1 2 3 4 5
10 The (dependent-independent) variables of the study 1 2 3 4 5
11 Indication of the statistical methods adopted in the study 1 2 3 4 5
12 The compliance of the findings section of the research with the aim of the study 1 2 3 4 5
13 Exhibiting the results in a clear and impartial fashion 1 2 3 4 5
14 Presentation of the results of the statistical analysis in the results 1 2 3 4 5
15 Appropriateness of the statistical analyses in the results 1 2 3 4 5
16 Indication of the significant outcomes of the study 1 2 3 4 5
17 Has the study achieved significant/beneficial results? 1 2 3 4 5
18 Are there suggestions based on the outcomes of the study? 1 2 3 4 5
19 Are the references sufficient in number, up-to-date and related to and appropriate for the subject?(taken into consideration for full papers) 1 2 3 4 5
20 Is the study written in a clear language?
The scientific language must be used correctly, the article must not be too long, and the grammar and abbreviations must be used properly.
1 2 3 4 5
Evaluation Form for REVIEW-TYPE Papers
Question No Evaluation Questions Very Poor Poor Mediocre Good Very Good
1 Heading of the paper:
Is it appropriate in terms of defining the study? (Must be short, concise and meaningful, must reflect the content of the review and must be appropriate in terms of describing and generalizing the study)
1 2 3 4 5
2 Subject of Review:
Originality of the subject and compliance of the review with the main theme of the Congress
1 2 3 4 5
3 Aim:
The importance, grounds and aim of the subject of review
1 2 3 4 5
4 The data collection method:
Information on when, by whom, how, and using what kind of sources the review was prepared
1 2 3 4 5
5 The system of the review:
Are the historical processes and fundamental-standard-conventional information regarding the subject examined? Are the missing or controversial points in the literature regarding the subject identified?
1 2 3 4 5
6 The way the topic is tackled:
Is the information listed from the general to the specific, in line with the conceptual framework and under titles?
1 2 3 4 5
7 Evaluation/Results:
The available data is separated and then analyzed. New syntheses are made and content that will be beneficial to use, the unknown or problems that are faced are identified. Contrarieties are exhibited. Solutions may be offered to the defined problems. New research questions are developed.
1 2 3 4 5
8 Success of the review/Discussion/comment:
Does the information in the compiled papers in compliance with the aim and grounds? Is the information listed in an order? Are the findings exhibited in a clear and impartial fashion? Indication of the significant outcomes of the study? Are there suggestions based on the outcomes of the study?
1 2 3 4 5
9 References:
Are the references sufficient in number, up-to-date and related to and appropriate for the subject? Does it include new information emerged in the related topic? Is the literature scanned sufficiently?(taken into consideration for full papers)
1 2 3 4 5
10 Is the study written in a clear language?
The scientific language must be used correctly, the article must not be too long, and the grammar and abbreviations must be used properly.
1 2 3 4 5
DURATION OF CONGRESS
ANNOUNCEMENTS
  • After evaluation of 15 papers, which are presented in congress, will obtain a right to publish in JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY (JEPE), indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded.

  • After evaluation of 60 papers, which are presented in congress, will obtain a right to publish in TURKISH BULLETIN OF HYGIENE AND EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY , indexed nationally and internationally.

  • After evaluation of 50 papers, which are presented in congress, will obtain a right to publish in AQUATIC SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, indexed nationally and internationally.

  • After evaluation of 60 papers, which are presented in congress, will obtain a right to publish in TURKISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL / ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE AND SAFETY, indexed in nationally and internationally.

SUPPORTING ORGANIZATIONS